Skip to navigation | Skip to content



Posts tagged ‘vāmācāra’

  1. The Kaula traditions – I

    Who, or what, are the Kaula traditions? It’s a question that has bedeviled me ever since I read the teasing footnote references to “Kaula comment” in Kenneth Grant’s Typhonian trilogies back in the early 1980s. In Cults of the Shadow (Frederick Muller, 1975) for example, Grant made several references to the “Kaula Cult of the Vama Marg”, its secret rites and esoteric sexual practices. It seemed to be all very secret, hush-hush, and confusing. Over the years, I’d occasionally find people throwing the term Kaula about in various forums, and would ask them what the “Kaula Cult” actually was. It was hard to get a straight answer, and I often came away with the impression that these folk didn’t really have much of a sense of what the Kaulas actually consisted of, much less be able to point to a particular historical tradition or scripture. Continue reading »

    Share
  2. On the dakṣiṇācāra and the vāmācāra – IV

    In the previous post in this series I took a quick look at the earliest form of the non-Saiddhāntika or vāmācāra traditions of the tantras – the Caturbhaginī or “Four Sisters” system. For this post I shall briefly examine two more early vāmācāra streams, the Mantrapīṭha and the Vidyāpīṭha. Continue reading »

    Share
  3. On the dakṣiṇācāra and the vāmācāra – III

    In the previous post in this series I gave a brief overview of the “mainstream” or base of the Śaiva mantramārg – the Śaiva Siddhānta. I will now turn to an examination of the non-Saiddhāntika traditions that developed around it. These were a diverse array of traditions focused on the worship of the fierce ectype of Śiva – Bhairava – often seen as a “higher” form of Śiva, and various forms of the Goddess – Śiva’s power or Śākti. Continue reading »

    Share
  4. On the dakṣiṇācāra and the vāmācāra – II

    In the last post in this series I began my examination of the two streams of tantric discipline – the dakṣiṇācāra and the vāmācāra – or as they have become known, the Right-Hand and the Left-Hand Path. The key point I wanted to make was that the relationship between the two streams was not oppositional and exclusionary – as the two streams are represented in popular occulture. In this post, I will provide a brief overview of the Śaiva Siddhānta tradition. Continue reading »

    Share
  5. On the dakṣiṇācāra and the vāmācāra – I

    Of late I have been revisiting some earlier work I did on the passage of the concept of the “Left-Hand Path” into Western Esotericism. A consistent theme throughout Western Esoteric discourse almost from its inception (in the work of Madame Blavatsky and later Theosophical works) is that the so-called “Right-Hand Path and Left-Hand Path are binary opposites, and to align with one is to exclude the other. Continue reading »

    Share